From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5] Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:08:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4D9B5A96.3010603@codemonkey.ws> References: <20110405150703.GQ22884@x200.localdomain> <20110405160119.GF8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <1302020868.2669.13.camel@freedom> <20110405170830.GG8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Swapna Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:58874 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755605Ab1DESI2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:08:28 -0400 Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so486237vxi.19 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:08:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110405170830.GG8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > >> The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination >> program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have >> all infrastructure in place there. If we need graphical clients being >> started and controlled on a linux bare metal machine, I am afraid we'll >> have to resort to those GUI test automation frameworks I mentioned. if >> our test is geared more towards windows clients, then they won't be >> needed, sure. > oh, but the added requirement is just launching the client It would be interesting to have autotest support getting screen grabs from a client vs. directly from qemu. That would allow you to run the step files through the client. Regards, Anthony Liguori