public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com,
	gorcunov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:04:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9E6D19.1040809@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110406105547.GA13766@elte.hu>

On 04/06/2011 05:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Splitting up a project into several trees, often unnecessarily, is a
> self-inflicted wound really.

There's certainly something to this but the bit that surprises me is the 
approaching being taken.

Why not take perf and all the other tools, stick them in their own git 
repos, and use git submodules to track them in the main kernel source 
tree.  It seems like a nicer way to separate git histories while still 
getting the benefits of a shared repository.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-08  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-31 17:30 [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool Pekka Enberg
     [not found] ` <1B1AE097-4524-4026-85EC-F9A0E274FFF2@suse.de>
2011-04-01  7:07   ` Carsten Otte
2011-04-01  7:37     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-01 14:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-02 20:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-03  6:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-03  8:24     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-03  8:53       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03  9:06         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-03  9:37         ` CaT
2011-04-04 10:31         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-03  8:51   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03  9:17     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-03  8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-03  9:59   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03 10:11     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-03 10:17       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03 10:22         ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-03 10:32           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03 13:09       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-03 13:19         ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-06  9:33           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-06  9:36             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-04-06  9:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-06  9:49                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-06  9:51                 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-04-06 10:14             ` Olivier Galibert
2011-04-06 10:55               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-08  2:04                 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-04-08  2:14             ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-08  5:14               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-08  6:19                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-08  6:47                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-08  6:51                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-08  7:10                     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-08  7:39                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-08  8:27                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-08  9:11                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-08  9:32                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-08 10:42                         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-08 12:27                           ` Alexander Graf
2011-04-08 12:33                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-08 14:39                         ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-08 14:00                 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-08 19:20                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-04-08 22:59                     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-10  8:05                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-09  7:40                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-12  0:58                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-04-09 18:23                   ` Olivier Galibert
2011-04-10  2:54                     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-08 15:59               ` Scott Wood
2011-04-08 22:58                 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-06  8:59         ` Markus Armbruster
2011-04-06  9:29           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-04-03  9:01 ` Alon Levy
2011-04-03 10:01   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-03 10:15     ` Alon Levy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D9E6D19.1040809@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox