From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4D9E6D19.1040809@codemonkey.ws> References: <1301592656.586.15.camel@jaguar> <4D982E89.8070502@redhat.com> <4D9847BC.9060906@redhat.com> <4D98716D.9040307@codemonkey.ws> <4D9873CD.3080207@redhat.com> <20110406093333.GB6465@elte.hu> <20110406101405.GA65838@dspnet.fr> <20110406105547.GA13766@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olivier Galibert , Avi Kivity , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110406105547.GA13766@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 04/06/2011 05:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Splitting up a project into several trees, often unnecessarily, is a > self-inflicted wound really. There's certainly something to this but the bit that surprises me is the approaching being taken. Why not take perf and all the other tools, stick them in their own git repos, and use git submodules to track them in the main kernel source tree. It seems like a nicer way to separate git histories while still getting the benefits of a shared repository. Regards, Anthony Liguori