From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: buggy emulate_int_real
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:51:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA4BB40.2010201@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412183158.GA29423@hallyn.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4000 bytes --]
On 2011-04-12 20:31, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kiszka@siemens.com):
>> On 2011-04-12 16:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2011 05:12 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>> Quoting Avi Kivity (avi@redhat.com):
>>>>> On 04/12/2011 10:53 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>>> >Quoting Avi Kivity (avi@redhat.com):
>>>>> >> On 04/09/2011 12:09 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>>> >> >Hi,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090, it was
>>>>> >> >found that emulate_int_real() sometimes pushes the wrong eip when doing a
>>>>> >> >int. Whereas with non-kvm qemu we push the next instruction after the
>>>>> >> >int, with kvm we push the addr of the instruction itself.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> The code says:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> c->src.val = c->eip;
>>>>> >> emulate_push(ctxt, ops);
>>>>> >> rc = writeback(ctxt, ops);
>>>>> >> if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>>>>> >> return rc;
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> which appears to be the address of the next instruction from my
>>>>> >> reading of the code (see how insn_fetch() increments c->eip).
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Nevertheless removing commits
>>>>> >
>>>>> > a92601bb707f6f49fd5563ef3d09928e70cc222e
>>>>> > 63995653ade16deacaea5b49ceaf6376314593ac
>>>>> > 6e154e56b4d7a6a28c54f0984e13d3f8defc4755
>>>>> >
>>>>> >changes the eip value being pushed. If you look at
>>>>> >a92601bb707f6f49fd5563ef3d09928e70cc222e, you see:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > if (vmx->rmode.vm86_active) {
>>>>> >- vmx->rmode.irq.pending = true;
>>>>> >- vmx->rmode.irq.vector = nr;
>>>>> >- vmx->rmode.irq.rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
>>>>> >- if (kvm_exception_is_soft(nr))
>>>>> >- vmx->rmode.irq.rip +=
>>>>> >- vmx->vcpu.arch.event_exit_inst_len;
>>>>> >- intr_info |= INTR_TYPE_SOFT_INTR;
>>>>> >- vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD, intr_info);
>>>>> >- vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN, 1);
>>>>> >- kvm_rip_write(vcpu, vmx->rmode.irq.rip - 1);
>>>>> >+ if (kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(vcpu, nr) != EMULATE_DONE)
>>>>> >+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
>>>>> > return;
>>>>> > }
>>>>> >
>>>>> >but kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt() does not appear to increment
>>>>> >vmx->rmode.irq.rip anywhere, as the code being replaced does.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, I see now. There are two cases, hard interrupt and soft
>>>>> interrupts. I guess hard interrupts are handled fine, and the
>>>>> failing case is
>>>>>
>>>>> guest executes INTn instruction in guest mode
>>>>> vmx intercepts a page fault (say due to access to the IDT or the stack)
>>>>> kvm notes that a soft interrupt was in progress (vmx_complete_interrupts)
>>>>> kvm handles the exception
>>>>> reinject the interrupt while reentering the guest
>>>>>
>>>>> so we do need something like
>>>>>
>>>>> if (soft)
>>>>> vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.eip += inst_len;
>>>>>
>>>>> in kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt().
>>>>
>>>> Oops, right. Disregard last email pls :)
>>>>
>>>> So is 'kvm_exception_is_soft(irq)' a reliable check?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, need to check vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft instead. Not sure about
>>> kvm_exception_is_soft(). Jan?
>>
>> Jumping late on this, I don't understand the question. Reliable /wrt what?
>
> As to whether we are supposed to increment eip or not.
From a brief refresh-reading, I would say
if (interrupt.soft || kvm_exception_is_soft(nr))
increment_eip_by_inst_len
but only for those interrupts/exceptions which were raised by the
triggering instructions, _not_ for exceptions raise while processing
them (e.g. a page fault while accessing the IDT).
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 21:09 buggy emulate_int_real Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-10 8:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-12 7:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 8:02 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-12 13:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 14:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-12 14:12 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 14:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-12 15:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-12 18:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 20:51 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-04-12 21:25 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 22:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-12 23:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-13 13:24 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-13 13:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-13 13:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA4BB40.2010201@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox