From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:49:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAD308A.3090503@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110419064601.GM2192@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]
On 2011-04-19 08:46, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:02:35PM -0400, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2011-03-25 09:44, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> + tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc ? 0 :
>>>>> + tsc - vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc;
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> This patch appears to cause troubles to Linux guests on TSC clocksource
>>>> and APIC highres timer. The first boot after qemu start is always fine,
>>>> but after a reboot the guest timer appears to fire incorrectly or even
>>>> not at all.
>>>>
>>>> Was this patch tested with a guest reboot scenario as well? Does it
>>>> account for the TSC being reset to 0 on reboot?
>>>>
>>> Hmm, probably the last_guest_tsc is not updated correctly in this
>>> scenario. I will have a look tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Joerg
>>>
>>>
>>
>> To avoid this problem, when the TSC is reset, the overshoot protection
>> where last_guest_tsc is used is specifically disabled:
>>
>> /* Reset of TSC must disable overshoot protection below */
>> vcpu->arch.hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = 0;
>> vcpu->arch.last_tsc_write = data;
>> vcpu->arch.last_tsc_nsec = ns;
>>
>> You can probably use the same test - last_guest_tsc is only valid if
>> tsc_timestamp above != 0.
>
> Yes, this should also work. But the other way we get rid of
> last_host_tsc which is also a good thing :)
That reminds me: I think we still have the bug that KVM overeagerly
declares the host's TSC unstable after resume from S3 because the TSC
appears to go backward when KVM checks. Or should this have been fixed now?
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 8:44 [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v3 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: SVM: Implement infrastructure for TSC_RATE_MSR Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: Let kvm-clock report the right tsc frequency Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel
2011-03-27 10:57 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-27 11:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-16 16:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-17 12:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-19 0:02 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-19 6:46 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-19 6:49 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-04-19 14:15 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-19 14:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-18 8:03 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-18 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-18 9:25 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: X86: Implement call-back to propagate virtual_tsc_khz Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: X86: Delegate tsc-offset calculation to architecture code Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25 8:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Implement userspace interface to set virtual_tsc_khz Joerg Roedel
2011-03-27 10:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v3 Avi Kivity
2011-04-06 7:33 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-24 7:40 [PATCH 0/6][RESEND] TSC scaling support for KVM v2 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-24 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel
2011-03-15 9:36 [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v2 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-15 9:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DAD308A.3090503@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).