kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: KVM mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: performance of virtual functions compared to virtio
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:57:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAF8EF0.8010203@gmail.com> (raw)

In general should virtual functions outperform virtio+vhost for
networking performance - latency and throughput?

I have 2 VMs running on a host. Each VM has 2 nics -- one tied to a VF
and the other going through virtio and a tap device like so:

   ------                  ----
  |      |----------------| VF |---
  |      |                 ----   |
  | VM 1 |                        |
  |      |    -----               |
  |      |---| tap |---           |
   ------     -----   |          ---
                     ---        | e |
                    | b |       | t |
                    | r |       | h |
                     ---        | 2 |
   ------     -----   |          ---
  |      |---| tap |---           |
  |      |    -----               |
  | VM 2 |                        |
  |      |                 ----   |
  |      |----------------| VF |---
   ------                  ----

The network arguments to qemu-kvm are:
-netdev type=tap,vhost=on,ifname=tap2,id=netdev1
-device virtio-net-pci,mac=${mac},netdev=netdev1

where ${mac} is unique to each VM and for the VF:
-device pci-assign,host=${pciid}

netserver is running within the VMs, and the netperf commands I am
running are:

  netperf -p 12346 -H <ip> -l 20 -jcC -fM -v 2 -t TCP_RR -- -r 1024
  netperf -p 12346 -H <ip> -l 20 -jcC -fM -v 2 -t TCP_STREAM

where <ip> changes depending on which interface I want to send the
traffic through. To say the least results are a bit disappointing for
the VF:

                  latency   throughput
              (usec/Tran)   (MB/sec)
Host-VM
 over virtio      139.160    1199.40
 over VF          488.124     209.22

VM-VM
 over virtio      322.056     773.54
 over VF          488.051     328.88

I am just getting started with VFs and could use some hints on how to
improve the performance.

Host:
  Dell R410
  2 quad core E5620@2.40 GHz processors
  16 GB RAM
  Intel 82576 NIC (Gigabit ET Quad Port)
  Fedora 14
  kernel: 2.6.35.12-88.fc14.x86_64
  qemu-kvm-0.13.0-1.fc14.x86_64

VMs:
  Fedora 14
  kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
  2 vcpus
  1GB RAM

Thanks,

David

             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-21  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-21  1:57 David Ahern [this message]
2011-04-21  2:35 ` performance of virtual functions compared to virtio Alex Williamson
2011-04-21  8:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-21 12:31     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-21 13:09       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-25 17:49         ` David Ahern
2011-04-26  8:19           ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-27 21:13             ` David Ahern
2011-04-28  8:07               ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-25 17:46     ` David Ahern
2011-04-26  8:20       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-25 17:39   ` David Ahern
2011-04-25 18:13     ` Alex Williamson
2011-04-25 19:07       ` David Ahern
2011-04-25 19:29         ` Alex Williamson
2011-04-25 19:49           ` David Ahern
2011-04-25 20:27             ` Alex Williamson
2011-04-25 20:40               ` David Ahern
2011-04-25 21:02                 ` Alex Williamson
2011-04-25 21:14                   ` David Ahern
2011-04-25 21:18                     ` Alex Williamson
2011-04-25 20:49             ` Andrew Theurer
2011-05-02 18:58         ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DAF8EF0.8010203@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).