From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] qemu-kvm: hpet: Add MSI support for in-kernel irqchip mode Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4DB6FB9A.10907@siemens.com> References: <3d089633897515a214af032ed633342a7001945f.1303823975.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <4DB6D01C.6080706@siemens.com> <20110426160602.GA1048@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:18367 "EHLO goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754205Ab1DZRGr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:06:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110426160602.GA1048@infradead.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-04-26 18:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> +static bool modifying_bit(uint64_t old, uint64_t new, uint64_t mask) >> +{ >> + return (old ^ new) & mask; >> +} >> + > > A more usual name would be toggle_bit. But you're passing in a mask > to be modified, so it would be more a toggle_bits or toggle_mask. > This function is checking for a change. But I've no problem renaming it to toggling_bit or so if that's preferred. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux