kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com, Joerg.Roedel@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] KVM: MMU: Optimize guest page table walk
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:15:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB6FDA0.8000200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427001306.0f6eb09f.takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>

On 04/26/2011 06:13 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >  Please post a simple patch that uses two get_user()s for that case
> >  (64-bit pte on 32-bit host).  Then work with the x86 tree to see if
> >  they'll accept 64-bit get_user(), and once they do, we can go back to a
> >  simple get_user() again.
> >
> >  btw, I think we can use __get_user() here since the address must have
> >  been already validated.
>
> Yes, I thought that at first.
>
> But don't we need to care KVM's address translation bugs?

It's a pity to do a runtime check when we can do a setup time check 
instead.  So let's review the setup code and then use __get_user().

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-26 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-21 15:32 [PATCH 0/1 v2] KVM: MMU: Optimize guest page table walk Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-21 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/1 " Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-24  7:27   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-24 13:15     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-25  8:04   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-25  8:32     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-25  9:15       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-26  4:50         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-26  6:34           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-26 14:40             ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-26 14:54               ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-26 15:13                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-26 17:15                   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-04-26 16:26                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-04-26 17:16                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-26  7:42     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-26  7:45       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-26  8:21         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB6FDA0.8000200@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).