From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in KVM clock backwards compensation
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:06:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB911D9.3010409@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB9106D.6040203@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1869 bytes --]
On 2011-04-28 08:59, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> So I've been going over the new code changes to the TSC related code and
> I don't like one particular set of changes. In particular, here:
>
> kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
> if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu) || check_tsc_unstable()) {
> /* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */
> s64 tsc_delta;
> u64 tsc;
>
> kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_TSC, &tsc);
> tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc ? 0 :
> tsc - vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc;
>
> if (tsc_delta < 0)
> mark_tsc_unstable("KVM discovered backwards TSC");
> if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
> kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, -tsc_delta);
> vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
> }
>
>
> The point of this code fragment is to test the host clock to see if it
> is stable, because we may have just come back from an idle phase which
> stopped the TSC, switched CPUs, or come back from a deep sleep state
> which reset the host TSC.
>
> However, the above code is fetching the guest TSC instead of the host
> TSC, which isn't the way it is supposed to work.
>
> I saw a patch floating around that touched this code recently, but I
> think there's a definite issue here that needs addressing.
And /me still wonders (like I did when this first popped up) if the
proper place of determining TSC stability really have to be KVM.
If the Linux core fails to detect some instability and KVM has to jump
in, shouldn't we better improve the core's detection abilities and make
use of them in KVM? Conceptually this looks like we are currently just
working around a core deficit in KVM.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 6:59 Bug in KVM clock backwards compensation Zachary Amsden
2011-04-28 7:06 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-04-28 7:22 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-28 19:06 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-28 22:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-28 17:48 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-28 7:13 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-28 18:34 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-28 20:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-29 3:00 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-29 8:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-29 18:17 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB911D9.3010409@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).