From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Virtualize BTS?
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:53:28 +0300
Message-ID: <4DB98D78.80907@redhat.com>
References: <BANLkTimmoXhXLMNunTFSbhO0DetZq3R0Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30812 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754103Ab1D1Pxd (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:53:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimmoXhXLMNunTFSbhO0DetZq3R0Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/28/2011 06:03 PM, Jun Koi wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am wondering if current KVM version virtualizes the BTS (Branch
> Trace Store) facility? do we have this facility inside VM?
>

No.  On AMD we do virtualize a similar feature (LBR).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function