From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:10:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC00CC5.9020800@siemens.com> References: <4DBFFD57.4070909@siemens.com> <4DBFFE26.5040707@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "quintela@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , KVM devel mailing list To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:26391 "EHLO david.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001Ab1ECOKY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2011 10:10:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DBFFE26.5040707@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-05-03 15:07, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 05/03/2011 08:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote: >>> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >> >> Provided there will be more topics: >> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze > > This has come up a few times in the past. > > The opposition tends to be that it would make feature development harder > because you couldn't easily point QEMU at a different set of kernel headers. There should be no need to worry, even if for those bits that will continue to change more frequently. I've included a hopefully easy to use update mechanism. > > These days, so few things change in the KVM interface though that maybe > it's not the end of the world. PowerPC and future KVM arch will go through the same changes that x86 should be through now. So I would prefer to avoid the mistakes we made for the latter. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux