From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:52:04 +0300 Message-ID: <4DD24544.1000408@redhat.com> References: <1305129333-7456-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1305129333-7456-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/11/2011 06:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > perf maintainers: please consider the first three patches for merging (the > first two make sense even without the rest). If you're familiar with the Intel > PMU, please review patch 5 as well - it effectively undoes all your work > of abstracting the PMU into perf_events by unabstracting perf_events into what > is hoped is a very similar PMU. Perf maintainers, ping? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function