public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v2)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:02:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDDFB07.2050909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526065511.GA29458@redhat.com>

On 05/26/2011 09:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >  >
> >  >+	case SrcDX:
> >  >+		c->src.type = OP_REG;
> >  >+		c->src.bytes = c->op_bytes;
> >
> >  Needs to be 2.  Otherwise we'll see extra bits from edx, or lose
> >  bits from dx if it's a 1-byte instruction.
> >
> But those extra bits will be dropped by check_perm_in() anyway.

It isn't nice to depend on it.

btw, Marcelo, the patch should also make use of the decode during execution:

     case 0xef: /* out dx,(e/r)ax */
         c->dst.val = c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX];

^^ can drop


     do_io_out:
         ops->pio_out_emulated(ctxt, c->src.bytes, c->dst.val,
&c->src.val, 1);
         c->dst.type = OP_NONE;    /* Disable writeback. */
         break;

> Can
> c->op_bytes ever be 1?

in %dx, %al

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 17:11 KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-24 17:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-24 19:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-24 19:18     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-24 19:25       ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-25 18:18   ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-26  6:31     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26  6:55       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  7:02         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-05-26  7:04           ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26  7:07             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  7:49               ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  8:26                 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  9:00                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  9:02                     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  9:23                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  9:29                         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26 10:43                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-26 11:56       ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-29  8:34         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 18:23           ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-30 18:28             ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 18:23           ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v3) Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDDFB07.2050909@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox