From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: drop -enable-nesting Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:42:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE3BAE8.6010702@siemens.com> References: <4DDAD5CF.5050805@redhat.com> <4DE0B4B1.1000407@web.de> <20110530081847.GC27062@amd.com> <4DE3A3EC.80201@siemens.com> <20110530143846.GA2957@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> <4DE3B1E2.7020006@siemens.com> <20110530151020.GB7855@amd.com> <4DE3B4A5.6050509@siemens.com> <4DE3B572.6030105@redhat.com> <4DE3B765.8000806@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Nadav Har'El , kvm , john cooper , "Roedel, Joerg" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DE3B765.8000806@siemens.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2011-05-30 17:27, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-05-30 17:19, Avi Kivity wrote: >> I think it's safe to drop -enable-nesting immediately. Dan, does >> libvirt make use of it? > > I'm currently checking with some customer who played with Proxmox and > nesting if that stack was aware of the switch or accepted it only via a > side channel. It was a side channel for tweaking the command line options. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux