From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Android-virt] [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: KVM: Initial skeleton to compile KVM support Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:33:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4DEBAFD4.7040208@redhat.com> References: <20110603150318.17011.82777.stgit@ubuntu> <4DE8FE38.6030405@siemens.com> <4DE90397.5080801@siemens.com> <4DEB74DA.2040909@redhat.com> <4DEB8F22.1020802@web.de> <4DEB9033.9060109@redhat.com> <4DEB998E.1010805@web.de> <4DEB9C60.1030001@redhat.com> <4DEB9D4A.9060702@web.de> <4DEBAE9F.2010400@redhat.com> <21338E26-01D2-4A1A-816B-2D596EC557B8@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoffer Dall , kvm@vger.kernel.org, a.costa@virtualopensystems.com, Jan Kiszka , android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu, s.raho@virtualopensystems.com To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32484 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754460Ab1FEQdo (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2011 12:33:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <21338E26-01D2-4A1A-816B-2D596EC557B8@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> > >> Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are > >> you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance). > > > > Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in x86 and ARM. > > An in-kernel MPIC implementation is coming for PPC, so I don't see any reason to switch from something that works now. Right, this is spilled milk. Does the ppc qemu implementation raise KVM_INTERRUPT solely from the vcpu thread? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function