From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Flypen CloudMe <flypen@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why doesn't Intel e1000 NIC work correctly in Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:31:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF87BD6.4010002@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF86783.4060608@siemens.com>
On 2011-06-15 10:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-15 02:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 16:11 +0800, Flypen CloudMe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use Redhat Enterprise Linux 6, and use the KVM that is released by
>>> Redhat officially. The kernel version is 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64.
>>>
>>> It seems that the IRQs are conflicted after reboot. The NIC and the
>>> SCSI controller have the same IRQ number. If I re-install the NIC
>>> driver, the IRQ number of the NIC will be assigned another value, then
>>> it can work normally. Do we have a way to let the NIC and the SCSI
>>> controller have different IRQ number in VM?
>>
>> I'll see if I can reproduce and figure anything out. Windows XP isn't a
>> guest we concentrate on, especially with device assignment. Are you
>> using an AMD or Intel host system? Does the same thing happen if you
>> run the XP guest on an IDE controller? It would be helpful to post the
>> guest configuration, command line used or libvirt xml. Also, you might
>> try latest upstream qemu-kvm to see if the problem still exists.
>
> Maybe tracking of the INTx route across reset fails. Does this help?
>
> diff --git a/hw/device-assignment.c b/hw/device-assignment.c
> index 7eeecad..0693141 100644
> --- a/hw/device-assignment.c
> +++ b/hw/device-assignment.c
> @@ -1719,6 +1719,8 @@ static void reset_assigned_device(DeviceState *dev)
> * disconnected from the PCI bus. This avoids further DMA transfers.
> */
> assigned_dev_pci_write_config(pci_dev, PCI_COMMAND, 0, 2);
> +
> + assign_irq(adev);
> }
>
> static int assigned_initfn(struct PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>
Nonsense, can't t make a difference as the PIIX3 resets the routing to
disable - which device-assignment does not deal with, but that's unrelated.
Try assigning a different slot to the passed-through adapter and the
lsi. For me it helped to put the lsi on one slot behind the
auto-assigned (-device lsi,addr=5).
I guess classic device assignment cannot support INTx sharing as the
kernel IRQ injection path does not inform user space about the device
state /wrt IRQs. Should be catch and reject this, or try to fix it up be
moving the assigned device around, Alex?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTikfV+LBZTxNWdvd_ts-7DBSei3jRA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-14 2:15 ` Fwd: Why doesn't Intel e1000 NIC work correctly in Windows XP? Flypen CloudMe
2011-06-14 3:23 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-14 8:11 ` Flypen CloudMe
2011-06-14 15:30 ` Decker, Schorschi
2011-06-15 0:54 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-15 8:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-15 9:31 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-06-15 18:42 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-19 12:29 ` Flypen CloudMe
2011-06-20 10:17 ` Dor Laor
2011-06-20 14:32 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-20 16:07 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF87BD6.4010002@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=flypen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox