From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] linux-user: remove unused variables Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:32:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF8C292.7080900@twiddle.net> References: <95538E92-0A9C-4464-BFE6-F44E528AB6FA@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S.Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook , Kevin Wolf , Gerd Hoffmann , Anthony Liguori , Riku Voipio , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , Alex Williamson , Blue Swirl , Stefan Weil , Jan Kiszka , Paolo Bonzini , Christoph Hellwig , Aurelien Jarno , Stefan Hajnoczi , Isaku Yamahata , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-yi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:42455 "EHLO mail-yi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754790Ab1FOOc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:32:56 -0400 Received: by yia27 with SMTP id 27so260408yia.19 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:32:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <95538E92-0A9C-4464-BFE6-F44E528AB6FA@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2011 01:35 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> - abi_ulong arg5 = 0, arg6 = 0, arg7 = 0, arg8 = 0; >> + abi_ulong arg5 = 0, arg6 = 0; >> >> nb_args = mips_syscall_args[syscall_num]; >> sp_reg = env->active_tc.gpr[29]; >> switch (nb_args) { >> /* these arguments are taken from the stack */ >> /* FIXME - what to do if get_user() fails? */ >> - case 8: get_user_ual(arg8, sp_reg + 28); >> - case 7: get_user_ual(arg7, sp_reg + 24); >> + case 8: /* get_user_ual(arg8, sp_reg + 28); */ >> + case 7: /* get_user_ual(arg7, sp_reg + 24); */ > > I'd prefer to see these and the respective variable definitions #if > 0'd with a comment, stating that they're currently unused. I'd prefer not to see if 0 code. Better, I think, to mark the variables as __attribute__((unused)) with that same comment. >> @@ -7058,18 +7056,14 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, >> case TARGET_NR_osf_sigprocmask: >> { >> abi_ulong mask; >> - int how = arg1; >> sigset_t set, oldset; >> >> switch(arg1) { >> case TARGET_SIG_BLOCK: >> - how = SIG_BLOCK; >> break; >> case TARGET_SIG_UNBLOCK: >> - how = SIG_UNBLOCK; >> break; >> case TARGET_SIG_SETMASK: >> - how = SIG_SETMASK; > > why go through the effort of setting "how" and then not using it? I'm > pretty sure this is a bug as well. A few lines down is the following > code: > > sigprocmask(arg1, &set, &oldset); > > which in TARGET_NR_sigprocmask would be: > > ret = get_errno(sigprocmask(how, &set, &oldset)); > > So we end up sending guest masks to the host. Richard, this is Alpha > specific code. Mind to double-check? I remember fixing this before. Perhaps it was in a patch tree that never got pulled... r~