From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for June 21 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:28:34 +0300 Message-ID: <4E00AA92.4080405@redhat.com> References: <4E008060.5020900@redhat.com> <4E00A1B3.9030508@codemonkey.ws> <4E00A322.2030006@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM devel mailing list , "Justin M. Forbes" , Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues To: Markus Armbruster Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29154 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756717Ab1FUO2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:28:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/21/2011 05:27 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > > > We can have a script that runs lspci -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv, x86info, > > and other interesting stuff and compare the results, and also system > > tests that boot a guest on multiple qemus (with the same -M and > > different -M) and see if things work. > > Suggest to compare info qtree as well. Good idea. Also the memory map, when the memory API is there. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function