From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] pci-assign: Generic config space access management
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:10:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E099A9D.6050803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110628085108.GL10881@redhat.com>
On 06/28/2011 11:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:55PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > -/* There can be multiple VNDR capabilities per device, we need to find the
> > - * one that starts closet to the given address without going over. */
> > -static uint8_t find_vndr_start(PCIDevice *pci_dev, uint32_t address)
> > +static uint32_t assigned_dev_pci_read_config(PCIDevice *pci_dev,
> > + uint32_t address, int len)
> > {
> > - uint8_t cap, pos;
> > + AssignedDevice *assigned_dev = DO_UPCAST(AssignedDevice, dev, pci_dev);
> > + uint32_t virt_val = pci_default_read_config(pci_dev, address, len);
> > + uint32_t real_val, direct_mask;
> >
> > - for (cap = pos = 0;
> > - (pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pci_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, pos));
> > - pos += PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT) {
> > - if (pos<= address) {
> > - cap = MAX(pos, cap);
> > - }
> > + switch (len) {
> > + case 4:
> > + direct_mask =
> > + pci_get_long(assigned_dev->direct_config_read + address);
> > + break;
> > + case 2:
> > + direct_mask =
> > + pci_get_word(assigned_dev->direct_config_read + address);
> > + break;
> > + case 1:
> > + direct_mask =
> > + pci_get_byte(assigned_dev->direct_config_read + address);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + abort();
> > }
>
> One small issue here is that I think read config is not guaranteed to
> get a length aligned address, while pci_get_XXX assume length
> alignment. Further, because of alignment you can get beyond
> the end of array.
>
> I don't think it ever happens in practice on the PC,
It cannot happen with CF8/CFC configuration (bits 1:0 of CF8 are
reserved), but it can happen with mmconfig.
> so we can
> add an assert, but it's might be easier to look at how
> pci_default_read_config handles all these issues:
>
> uint32_t val = 0;
> assert(len == 1 || len == 2 || len == 4);
> len = MIN(len, pci_config_size(d) - address);
> memcpy(&val, d->config + address, len);
> return le32_to_cpu(val);
>
> You can replace config with direct access, and check full access
> with:
>
> allones = ~0x0;
> memcmp(&allones,&val, len)
> and full emulation:
> zero = 0x0;
> memcmp(&zero,&val, len)
>
> This is not done correctly by current code btw, I think.
I think this should be done by the bus code.
On the original Pentium, a 4-byte write to address 7 would be issued as
a write to address 0 with #BE7 (byte enable 7) asserted, then a write to
address 0 with #BE0, #BE1, and #B2 asserted. That is, a one-byte write
followed by a 3-byte write.
The memory API has support for this (only at the device level at
present, but shouldn't be to difficult to implement at the bus level as
well).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 18:19 [PATCH 00/13] qemu-kvm: device assignment cleanups and upstream diff reductions Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 01/13] qemu-kvm: Reduce configure and Makefile.target diff to upstream Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 02/13] qemu-kvm: Drop some no longer needed #ifdefs Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 03/13] qemu-kvm: Drop -enable-nesting command line switch Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 10:48 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-28 10:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 11:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 04/13] qemu-kvm: Remove eventfd compat header Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 11:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 12:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 12:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 12:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-03 9:46 ` Bernhard Held
2011-07-03 9:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-03 9:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-03 18:31 ` Bernhard Held
2011-07-04 10:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-04 12:13 ` Bernhard Held
2011-07-04 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 05/13] qemu-kvm: Remove qemu_ram_unmap Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 06/13] qemu-kvm: Drop or replace useless device-assignment.h inclusions Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 07/13] pci-assign: Fix kvm_deassign_irq handling in assign_irq Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] pci-assign: Update legacy interrupts only if used Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 09/13] pci-assign: Drop libpci header dependency Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 10/13] pci-assign: Refactor calc_assigned_dev_id Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 11/13] pci-assign: Track MSI/MSI-X capability position, clean up related code Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 12/13] pci-assign: Generic config space access management Jan Kiszka
2011-06-27 20:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-27 22:48 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-28 7:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:07 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-28 8:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-28 8:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 8:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 9:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 9:10 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-06-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] qemu-kvm: Resolve PCI upstream diffs Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 8:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-28 9:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-28 8:10 ` [PATCH 00/13] qemu-kvm: device assignment cleanups and upstream diff reductions Avi Kivity
2011-06-28 8:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E099A9D.6050803@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox