From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:42:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4E1AFDD2.9010404@redhat.com> References: <1310389346-30790-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf , Hannes Reinecke To: Stefan Hajnoczi Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57308 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754217Ab1GKNjy (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:39:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 11.07.2011 15:34, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation. >> This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion. >> All of them have been acked, so please apply. > > Are SCSI patches going through Kevin's tree? > > If not, perhaps Paolo or I should keep a tree and start doing some > sanity testing on the subsystem in the future. As long as we don't have a SCSI maintainer, I'm going to pick them up for the block tree when they have receive some review. Doesn't mean that nobody should be doing sanity testing, of course. If anyone wants to take care of picking up and reviewing all SCSI patches, I'm also happy to pull from a separate tree. Kevin