From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ioeventfd: Introduce KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_SOCKET
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:26:17 +0300
Message-ID: <4E1C2F59.90600@redhat.com>
References: <1309927078-5983-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>	 <1309927078-5983-5-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>	 <20110706114203.GA18368@redhat.com> <1309964506.15123.13.camel@sasha>	 <20110706155135.GA21638@redhat.com> <1310276083.2393.6.camel@sasha>	 <20110710080559.GC1630@redhat.com> <1310469824.2393.22.camel@sasha>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23045 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752348Ab1GLL0j (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:26:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1310469824.2393.22.camel@sasha>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 07/12/2011 02:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> >  I don't insist on a new type of exit, just pointing out the problem.
>
> I agree with you, I don't have a better solution either.
>
> I don't feel it's worth it adding so much code for read support to
> properly work. Can we do this patch series without socket read support
> at the moment?

No.  As I said before, I don't want a fragmented ABI.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.