Re: [PATCH 5/5] ioeventfd: Introduce KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_SOCKET

Avi Kivity
2011-07-12T11:26:39Z

On 07/12/2011 02:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> > I don't insist on a new type of exit, just pointing out the problem.
>
> I agree with you, I don't have a better solution either.
>
> I don't feel it's worth it adding so much code for read support to
> properly work. Can we do this patch series without socket read support
> at the moment?

No. As I said before, I don't want a fragmented ABI.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.