From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New thread for the VM migration Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:09:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4E20AC76.6020104@codemonkey.ws> References: <1447945249.1317755.1310627692984.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4E1EAA72.1060103@redhat.com> <4E1EE183.5050100@codemonkey.ws> <4E1EE1F2.5020801@redhat.com> <4E1F0EC2.1050408@redhat.com> <4E1F1440.4080409@redhat.com> <4E1FF360.8010609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Umesh Deshpande , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:52873 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752419Ab1GOVJN (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:09:13 -0400 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so710045gxk.19 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:09:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1FF360.8010609@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/15/2011 02:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/14/2011 06:07 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >> Maybe we can do this via a magic subsection whose contents are the >> hotplug event. > > What about making the device list just another "thing" that has to be > migrated live, together with block and ram? In an ideal world, you would only create the backends on the destination node and all of the devices would be created through the migration process. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paolo >