From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: MMIO: Lock coalesced device when checking for available entry
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:11:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E23EACD.1020407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310729869-1451-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On 07/15/2011 02:37 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Move the check whether there are available entries to within the spinlock.
> This allows working with larger amount of VCPUs and reduces premature
> exits when using a large number of VCPUs.
>
> Cc: Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg<penberg@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin<levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
> index fc84875..34188db 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int coalesced_mmio_in_range(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev,
> */
> ring = dev->kvm->coalesced_mmio_ring;
> avail = (ring->first - ring->last - 1) % KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_MAX;
> - if (avail< KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
> + if (avail == 0) {
> /* full */
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -63,11 +63,14 @@ static int coalesced_mmio_write(struct kvm_io_device *this,
> {
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev = to_mmio(this);
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *ring = dev->kvm->coalesced_mmio_ring;
> - if (!coalesced_mmio_in_range(dev, addr, len))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> spin_lock(&dev->lock);
>
> + if (!coalesced_mmio_in_range(dev, addr, len)) {
> + spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> /* copy data in first free entry of the ring */
Hmm. This means we take the lock for every I/O, whether it hits
coalesced mmio or not.
We need to do the range check before taking the lock and the space check
after taking the lock.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-15 11:37 [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: MMIO: Lock coalesced device when checking for available entry Sasha Levin
2011-07-15 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: Raise the hard VCPU count limit Sasha Levin
2011-07-21 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-18 8:11 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-18 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: MMIO: Lock coalesced device when checking for available entry Sasha Levin
2011-07-18 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-18 10:15 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-18 11:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-18 12:03 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-18 12:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-18 12:58 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-18 13:11 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E23EACD.1020407@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox