From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:57:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E256301.1040700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311071471-15546-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On 07/19/2011 01:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This patch changes coalesced mmio to create one mmio device per
> zone instead of handling all zones in one device.
>
> Doing so enables us to take advantage of existing locking and prevents
> a race condition between coalesced mmio registration/unregistration
> and lookups.
>
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *kvm_vcpu_cache;
> */
> struct kvm_io_bus {
> int dev_count;
> -#define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 200
> +#define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 300
> struct kvm_io_device *devs[NR_IOBUS_DEVS];
> };
This means that a lot of non-coalesced-mmio users can squeeze out
coalesced-mmio. I don't know if it's really worthwhile, but the 100
coalesced mmio slots should be reserved so we are guaranteed they are
available.
>
> @@ -95,6 +85,8 @@ static void coalesced_mmio_destructor(struct kvm_io_device *this)
> {
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev = to_mmio(this);
>
> + list_del(&dev->list);
> +
> kfree(dev);
> }
>
No lock?
> int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_coalesced_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone *zone)
> {
> - int i;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev = kvm->coalesced_mmio_dev;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone *z;
> -
> - if (dev == NULL)
> - return -ENXIO;
> + struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev;
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> - i = dev->nb_zones;
> - while (i) {
> - z =&dev->zone[i - 1];
> -
> - /* unregister all zones
> - * included in (zone->addr, zone->size)
> - */
> -
> - if (zone->addr<= z->addr&&
> - z->addr + z->size<= zone->addr + zone->size) {
> - dev->nb_zones--;
> - *z = dev->zone[dev->nb_zones];
> + list_for_each_entry(dev,&kvm->coalesced_zones.items, list)
> + if (coalesced_mmio_in_range(dev, zone->addr, zone->size)) {
> + kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,&dev->dev);
> + kvm_iodevice_destructor(&dev->dev);
> }
> - i--;
> - }
No lock?
>
> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev {
> + struct list_head list;
> struct kvm_io_device dev;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> - spinlock_t lock;
> - int nb_zones;
> - struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone[KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_ZONE_MAX];
> + struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone zone;
> };
>
Why a list instead of a linear array?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 10:31 [PATCH v2] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device per zone Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 10:57 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-07-19 11:05 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 12:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-19 12:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-19 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-21 9:12 ` Amos Kong
2012-02-13 2:06 ` Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E256301.1040700@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox