public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IO: Intelligent device lookup on bus
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:43:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E26CD66.1080407@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311163918-14334-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>

On 2011-07-20 14:11, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Currently the method of dealing with an IO operation on a bus (PIO/MMIO)
> is to call the read or write callback for each device registered
> on the bus until we find a device which handles it.
> 
> Since the number of devices on a bus can be significant due to ioeventfds
> and coalesced MMIO zones, this leads to a lot of overhead on each IO
> operation.
> 
> Instead of registering devices, we now register ranges which points to
> a device. Lookup is done using an efficient bsearch instead of a linear
> search.
> 
> This should speed up all IO operations generated by the guest.
> 
> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> This patch depends on '[PATCH v3] MMIO: Make coalesced mmio use a device
> per zone'.
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c      |    4 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c      |    4 +-
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h  |   18 ++++----
>  virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c |    6 +--
>  virt/kvm/eventfd.c        |    3 +-
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c         |   13 +-----
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c       |  107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  7 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> index efad723..61d193c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
> @@ -713,13 +713,15 @@ struct kvm_pit *kvm_create_pit(struct kvm *kvm, u32 flags)
>  	kvm_register_irq_mask_notifier(kvm, 0, &pit->mask_notifier);
>  
>  	kvm_iodevice_init(&pit->dev, &pit_dev_ops);
> -	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, &pit->dev);
> +	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, KVM_PIT_BASE_ADDRESS,
> +					KVM_PIT_MEM_LENGTH, &pit->dev);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto fail;
>  
>  	if (flags & KVM_PIT_SPEAKER_DUMMY) {
>  		kvm_iodevice_init(&pit->speaker_dev, &speaker_dev_ops);
>  		ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS,
> +						KVM_SPEAKER_BASE_ADDRESS, 4,
>  						&pit->speaker_dev);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto fail_unregister;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> index 19fe855..c2295af 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,9 @@ struct kvm_pic *kvm_create_pic(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	 */
>  	kvm_iodevice_init(&s->dev, &picdev_ops);
>  	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> -	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, &s->dev);
> +	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, 0x20, 2, &s->dev);
> +	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, 0xa0, 2, &s->dev);
> +	ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_PIO_BUS, 0x4d0, 2, &s->dev);

This made me wonder if you are incorrectly registering the same device
multiple times. kvm_io_bus_register_dev is no longer optimally
describing what is done here: the registration of an IO range with the
bus. And that range is handled by a specific device. Conceptually, a
device is only attached once to some bus.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20 12:11 [PATCH] IO: Intelligent device lookup on bus Sasha Levin
2011-07-20 12:43 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-07-21  8:43   ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-21  9:49     ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-20 19:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-20 21:22   ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-21 10:05     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E26CD66.1080407@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox