From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW() Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:48 +0300 Message-ID: <4E2D576C.6090309@redhat.com> References: <1311583872-362-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E2D448C.9030306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Markus Armbruster Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32979 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781Ab1GYLpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:45:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/25/2011 02:02 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Side-stepping the stupid "OMG malloc(0) is weird, therefore we must make > qemu_malloc(0) differently weird" controversy would be useful all by > itself. If we all work together, we can make this thread even bigger than the tools/kvm pull request. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function