From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW() Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:59:14 +0300 Message-ID: <4E2D84C2.3050805@redhat.com> References: <1311583872-362-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E2D5D7C.40208@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D5F0D.2040303@redhat.com> <4E2D5FB3.7000906@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D7CD7.1060707@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D810E.3060104@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D82AA.8010307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Max Filippov , Blue Swirl , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: malc Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28180 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219Ab1GYO7Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:59:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/25/2011 05:58 PM, malc wrote: > > > > It's annoying that it takes this parameter at all, but I can live with it. > > > > n_structs? Yes. It's 1 in 1-epsilon of all cases. Would have preferred g_new and G_new_array instead. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function