From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW() Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:35:42 +0300 Message-ID: <4E2D8D4E.1050808@redhat.com> References: <1311583872-362-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E2D876C.3010300@redhat.com> <4E2D8896.7070100@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D8904.5080200@redhat.com> <4E2D89C7.8010004@redhat.com> <4E2D89E1.20401@redhat.com> <4E2D8AB4.3090106@redhat.com> <4E2D8B8C.2050500@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Jes Sorensen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E2D8B8C.2050500@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 07/25/2011 06:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > > I guess type safety doesn't matter to you. > > In my experience it's one of the lesser problems in the code. > It's a big issue to someone making widespread changes in the code (like me now). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function