From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Campbell Subject: Re: [Bug 40542] overflow/panic on KVM hipervizor Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:40:47 +0800 Message-ID: <4E3F3E9F.2060704@fnarfbargle.com> References: <201108041733.p74HXrVp006413@demeter2.kernel.org> <4E3E9596.7090908@fnarfbargle.com> <4E3EAA84.7040708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, slawek@rozbicki.eu, netdev To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from fnarfbargle.com ([93.93.131.224]:48653 "EHLO fnarfbargle.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811Ab1HHBlH (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:41:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E3EAA84.7040708@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/08/11 23:08, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/07/2011 04:39 PM, Brad Campbell wrote: >> >> This looks like the bug I've been fighting with on and off. > > What's the bugzilla number for that? > > (unfortunately, no great insight except for "CLOSED DUPLICATE") > > hopefully someone from netdev can take a look, DNAT is seriously broken. > I can reproduce it at will, but it's on a live production machine. I've just ordered a second machine which I can use to reproduce and test against. From a bisection standpoint I'm about half way between 2.6.35 & 2.6.36, but until the second machine arrives I'm just unable to chase it any further. Brad