From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/24] omap_gpmc/nseries/tusb6010: convert to memory API Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:41:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4E40E4B3.2060304@redhat.com> References: <1312823229-12822-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1312823229-12822-10-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E40D4F7.3080702@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Maydell Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468Ab1HIHlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:41:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/09/2011 10:37 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 August 2011 07:34, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Also, my patchset focuses on mechanical transformations. It is already > > risky enough in terms of regressions, I'm not going to rewrite/improve all > > of qemu; if you want those callbacks removed, you will have to remove them > > yourself. > > Sure. Can I ask you to drop this one and the onenand patch, and I'll > have a go over the next week or three at incorporating a conversion into > the patchset I have for those? > Umm... next week or three? I'd like to move fast on this. Can't you base your patches on this instead? After all, this is just a mechanical transformation, there should be no functional change. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.