public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:41:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4A1117.1030608@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4A10E8.5090705@cn.fujitsu.com>

The idea is from Avi:
| tag instructions that are typically used to modify the page tables, and
| drop shadow if any other instruction is used.
| The list would include, I'd guess, and, or, bts, btc, mov, xchg, cmpxchg,
| and cmpxchg8b.

This patch is used to tag the instructions and in the later path, shadow page
is dropped if it is written by other instructions

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 0453c07..e24c269 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
 #define RMExt       (4<<15)     /* Opcode extension in ModRM r/m if mod == 3 */
 #define Sse         (1<<18)     /* SSE Vector instruction */
 /* Misc flags */
+#define PageTable   (1 << 19)   /* instruction used to write page table */
 #define Prot        (1<<21) /* instruction generates #UD if not in prot-mode */
 #define VendorSpecific (1<<22) /* Vendor specific instruction */
 #define NoAccess    (1<<23) /* Don't access memory (lea/invlpg/verr etc) */
@@ -3018,10 +3019,10 @@ static struct opcode group7_rm7[] = {
 
 static struct opcode group1[] = {
 	I(Lock, em_add),
-	I(Lock, em_or),
+	I(Lock | PageTable, em_or),
 	I(Lock, em_adc),
 	I(Lock, em_sbb),
-	I(Lock, em_and),
+	I(Lock | PageTable, em_and),
 	I(Lock, em_sub),
 	I(Lock, em_xor),
 	I(0, em_cmp),
@@ -3076,18 +3077,21 @@ static struct group_dual group7 = { {
 
 static struct opcode group8[] = {
 	N, N, N, N,
-	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM), D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock),
-	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock), D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock),
+	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM),
+	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock | PageTable),
+	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock),
+	D(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Lock | PageTable),
 };
 
 static struct group_dual group9 = { {
-	N, D(DstMem64 | ModRM | Lock), N, N, N, N, N, N,
+	N, D(DstMem64 | ModRM | Lock | PageTable), N, N, N, N, N, N,
 }, {
 	N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
 } };
 
 static struct opcode group11[] = {
-	I(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | Mov, em_mov), X7(D(Undefined)),
+	I(DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | Mov | PageTable, em_mov),
+	X7(D(Undefined)),
 };
 
 static struct gprefix pfx_0f_6f_0f_7f = {
@@ -3099,7 +3103,7 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
 	I6ALU(Lock, em_add),
 	D(ImplicitOps | Stack | No64), D(ImplicitOps | Stack | No64),
 	/* 0x08 - 0x0F */
-	I6ALU(Lock, em_or),
+	I6ALU(Lock | PageTable, em_or),
 	D(ImplicitOps | Stack | No64), N,
 	/* 0x10 - 0x17 */
 	I6ALU(Lock, em_adc),
@@ -3108,7 +3112,7 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
 	I6ALU(Lock, em_sbb),
 	D(ImplicitOps | Stack | No64), D(ImplicitOps | Stack | No64),
 	/* 0x20 - 0x27 */
-	I6ALU(Lock, em_and), N, N,
+	I6ALU(Lock | PageTable, em_and), N, N,
 	/* 0x28 - 0x2F */
 	I6ALU(Lock, em_sub), N, I(ByteOp | DstAcc | No64, em_das),
 	/* 0x30 - 0x37 */
@@ -3141,11 +3145,11 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
 	G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm | ModRM | No64 | Group, group1),
 	G(DstMem | SrcImmByte | ModRM | Group, group1),
 	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM, em_test),
-	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Lock, em_xchg),
+	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Lock | PageTable, em_xchg),
 	/* 0x88 - 0x8F */
-	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Mov, em_mov),
+	I2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Mov | PageTable, em_mov),
 	I2bv(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM | Mov, em_mov),
-	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Mov, em_mov_rm_sreg),
+	I(DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM | Mov | PageTable, em_mov_rm_sreg),
 	D(ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess | DstReg),
 	I(ImplicitOps | SrcMem16 | ModRM, em_mov_sreg_rm),
 	G(0, group1A),
@@ -3158,7 +3162,7 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
 	II(ImplicitOps | Stack, em_popf, popf), N, N,
 	/* 0xA0 - 0xA7 */
 	I2bv(DstAcc | SrcMem | Mov | MemAbs, em_mov),
-	I2bv(DstMem | SrcAcc | Mov | MemAbs, em_mov),
+	I2bv(DstMem | SrcAcc | Mov | MemAbs | PageTable, em_mov),
 	I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | Mov | String, em_mov),
 	I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | String, em_cmp),
 	/* 0xA8 - 0xAF */
@@ -3255,18 +3259,19 @@ static struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
 	D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2CL | ModRM), N, N,
 	/* 0xA8 - 0xAF */
 	D(ImplicitOps | Stack), D(ImplicitOps | Stack),
-	DI(ImplicitOps, rsm), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock),
+	DI(ImplicitOps, rsm),
+	D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock | PageTable),
 	D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2ImmByte | ModRM),
 	D(DstMem | SrcReg | Src2CL | ModRM),
 	D(ModRM), I(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM, em_imul),
 	/* 0xB0 - 0xB7 */
-	D2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Lock),
+	D2bv(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | Lock | PageTable),
 	D(DstReg | SrcMemFAddr | ModRM), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock),
 	D(DstReg | SrcMemFAddr | ModRM), D(DstReg | SrcMemFAddr | ModRM),
 	D(ByteOp | DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM | Mov), D(DstReg | SrcMem16 | ModRM | Mov),
 	/* 0xB8 - 0xBF */
 	N, N,
-	G(BitOp, group8), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock),
+	G(BitOp, group8), D(DstMem | SrcReg | ModRM | BitOp | Lock | PageTable),
 	D(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM), D(DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM),
 	D(ByteOp | DstReg | SrcMem | ModRM | Mov), D(DstReg | SrcMem16 | ModRM | Mov),
 	/* 0xC0 - 0xCF */
-- 
1.7.5.4


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-16  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-16  6:40 [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:41 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-08-22 14:32   ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-22 14:36     ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-16  6:42 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 19:59   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-22 20:21     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 20:42       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-16  6:42 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark access bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 22:28   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23  1:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23  8:00   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 10:55     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 12:38       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 16:32         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 19:09           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 20:16             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-24 20:05               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  2:04                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  4:42                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:21                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25 14:06                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 14:07                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25  7:40                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25  7:57             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25 13:47               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26  3:18                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-26 10:53                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26 14:24                     ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E4A1117.1030608@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox