From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:21:05 +0800 Message-ID: <4E52BA31.4030203@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4E4A10E8.5090705@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E4A113F.5090404@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110822195929.GA2662@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , LKML , KVM To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:52945 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753668Ab1HVUTA (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:19:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110822195929.GA2662@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/23/2011 03:59 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> + if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map && !mmu_is_nested(vcpu)) >> + gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, cr2, NULL); > > Why write? > Since the fault is caused by page table written, and the 'gpa' can be written after instruction is retied. >> + kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT); >> + >> + /* >> + * The shadow pages have been zapped, then we call the page >> + * fault path to change the mapping to writable. >> + */ >> + vcpu->arch.mmu.page_fault(vcpu, cr2, PFERR_WRITE_MASK, true); > > I don't see why is this necessary. Just allowing the instruction to > proceed should be enough? > It used to avoid later VM-exit, since we will retry the instruction but the mapped is still read-only. So we can it to let the mapping become writable to avoid page fault again.