From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: about vEOI optimization
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:39:16 +0300
Message-ID: <4E55D1F4.4050904@redhat.com>
References: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F150630051F1F5@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4E54CBAB.5070401@redhat.com> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F150630051FB74@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39954 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751229Ab1HYEjU (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:39:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F150630051FB74@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 08/25/2011 05:24 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >  Another option is the hyper-V EOI support, which can also eliminate the
> >  EOI exit when no additional interrupt is pending.  This can improve EOI
> >  performance even more.
> >
>
> yes, and this is an orthogonal option.
>
> So if you agree, I'll send out an updated patch atop their work.
>
>

Thanks.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.