From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Emulator fuzz tester
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:11:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E56E4B7.1020703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314020469-30882-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On 08/22/2011 10:41 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> As it is exposed directly to guest code, the x86 emulator is an interesting
> target for exploiters: a vulnerability may lead to compromise of the entire
> host.
>
> In an attempt to catch vulnerabilities before they make it into production
> code, this patchset adds a fuzz tester for the emulator. Instructions
> are synthesized and fed into the emulator; a vulnerability will usually
> result in an access violation.
>
> I tried to make the emulator test build an run in userspace; this proved too
> difficult, so the test is built as part of the kernel. It can still be run
> in userspace, via KVM:
>
> qemu -enable-kvm -smp 4 -serial stdio -kernel bzImage \
> -append 'console=ttyS0 test_emulator.iterations=1000000000'
>
> ...
> starting emulator test
> emulator fuzz test results
> instructions: 1000000000
> decoded: 94330032
> emulated: 92529152
> nofault: 117
> failures: 0
> emulator test: PASS
> ...
>
> One billion random instructions failed to find a vulnerability, so either
> the emulator is really good, or the test is really bad, or we need a lot more
> runtime.
>
> Lucas, how would we go about integrating this into kvm-autotest?
I have applied the 3 patches on your latest tree, compiled the kernel
but I'm having trouble in running the test the way you described.
One thing I've noticed here: I can only compile the test as a kernel
module, not in the kernel image (menuconfig only gives me
(N/m/?). So I believe there's no way to test it the way you have
described... In any case I did try what you have suggested, then the
kernel panics due to the lack of a filesystem/init. After some reading,
I learned to create a bogus fs with a bogus init in it, but still, the
test does not run (I guess it's because the test module is not compiled
into the bzImage).
I assume there are some details you forgot to mention to get this
done... Would you mind posting a more detailed procedure?
To avoid misunderstandings, here is the outline of what I've tried:
1) Updated my kvm.git repo, so it reflects latest upstream
2) Applied all 3 patches of this series
3) make bzImage, make modules
4) Tried to boot with a very recent qemu-kvm compiled from HEAD (exec
name is like this because it's a symlink)
./qemu -smp 4 -serial stdio -kernel ~/Code/kvm/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage
-append 'console=ttyS0 test_emulator.iterations=1000000000'
No use (kernel panics due to a lack of rootfs and init).
5) Then I tried:
./qemu -smp 4 -serial stdio -kernel ~/Code/kvm/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage
-initrd rootfs -append 'root=/dev/ram console=ttyS0
test_emulator.iterations=1000000000'
No use either. Kernel will stand on the bogus init and do nothing else.
Cheers,
Lucas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-26 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 13:41 [PATCH 0/3] Emulator fuzz tester Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: make prototype of ->write_std() the same as ->write_emulated Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86 emulator: export main interface Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86 emulator: fuzz tester Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 16:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25 19:04 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 12:42 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 22:17 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2011-08-29 12:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] Emulator " Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2011-08-26 0:11 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
2011-08-29 12:05 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E56E4B7.1020703@redhat.com \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox