From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM got slow after adding more physical memory to host
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:08:20 +0300
Message-ID: <4E664574.9080608@redhat.com>
References: <20110906140201.GF18218@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4E663897.60901@redhat.com> <20110906153801.GA2152@nik-comp.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5241 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755190Ab1IFQIY (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:08:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20110906153801.GA2152@nik-comp.lan>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 09/06/2011 06:38 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hello Avi,
> thanks for quick reply!
>
> >  How many guests in there?
> two currently (one x86_64 centos, one winXP), with more, the box get even more unresponsive.
>

I don't really understand why the box is unresponsive.  What do top and 
'vmstat 1' say?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function