kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:50:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6F3589.1090107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6F2F54.4030004@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 09/13/2011 01:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 05:51 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 08/30/2011 05:34 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>  kvm_mmu_pte_write is unsafe since we need to alloc pte_list_desc in the
> >>  function when spte is prefetched, unfortunately, we can not know how many
> >>  spte need to be prefetched on this path, that means we can use out of the
> >>  free  pte_list_desc object in the cache, and BUG_ON() is triggered, also some
> >>  path does not fill the cache, such as INS instruction emulated that does not
> >>  trigger page fault
> >>
> >>  @@ -3716,10 +3735,6 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t cr2, u32 error_code,
> >>            goto out;
> >>        }
> >>
> >>  -    r = mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu);
> >>  -    if (r)
> >>  -        goto out;
> >>  -
> >>        er = x86_emulate_instruction(vcpu, cr2, 0, insn, insn_len);
> >>
> >
> >  Suppose we are out of memory, can't this get us in an endless loop?
> >
> >  return -ENOMEM breaks as out (and kills the guest, likely).
> >
>
> If memory is not enough, we just clear sptes on pte_write path(not prefetch spte),
> the later page fault path can return -1 to let guest crash. Hmm?
>

Yes.

btw, is rmap_can_add() sufficent?  We allocate more than just rmaps in 
mmu_topup_memory_caches().  I guess it is, but this is getting tricky.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-13 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-30  2:34 [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:47   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:24     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:53       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-14 10:19         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-15  4:56           ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark accessed bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:53   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:29     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:55       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-15 13:11         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-30  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 11:00   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:31     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:57       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-30  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 11:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 19:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:59       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13  9:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 10:24   ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:50     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-09-13 19:31       ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E6F3589.1090107@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).