kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:53:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E707991.10705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6F9FD2.4010407@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 09/13/2011 09:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>
> >>  +static bool retry_instruction(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> >>  +                  unsigned long cr2,  int emulation_type)
> >>  +{
> >>  +    if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map&&   !mmu_is_nested(vcpu))
> >>  +        gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, cr2, NULL);
> >
> >  If mmu_is_nested() cr2 is an ngpa, we have to translate it to a gpa, no?
> >
>
> Yeah, will fix it.
>
> And this bug also exists in the current code: it always uses L2 gpa to emulate
> write operation.

Can you please send this fix separately, so it can be backported if needed?

> I guess the reason that it is not triggered is: the gpa of L2's shadow page can
> not be touched by L2, it means no page table is write-protected by L2.

Yes.  All real guest hypervisors will do that.  But it is technically 
possible for a hypervisor to allow its guest access to the real page tables.

> >  btw, I don't see mmu.direct_map initialized for nested npt?
> >
>
> nested_svm_vmrun() ->  nested_svm_init_mmu_context():
> static int nested_svm_init_mmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> 	int r;
>
> 	r = kvm_init_shadow_mmu(vcpu,&vcpu->arch.mmu);
>
> 	vcpu->arch.mmu.set_cr3           = nested_svm_set_tdp_cr3;
> 	vcpu->arch.mmu.get_cr3           = nested_svm_get_tdp_cr3;
> 	vcpu->arch.mmu.get_pdptr         = nested_svm_get_tdp_pdptr;
> 	vcpu->arch.mmu.inject_page_fault = nested_svm_inject_npf_exit;
> 	vcpu->arch.mmu.shadow_root_level = get_npt_level();
> 	vcpu->arch.walk_mmu              =&vcpu->arch.nested_mmu;
>
> 	return r;
> }
>
> It is initialized in kvm_init_shadow_mmu :-)

Yes, need new eyeglasses.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-14  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-30  2:34 [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:47   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:24     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:53       ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-09-14 10:19         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-15  4:56           ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark accessed bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:53   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:29     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:55       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-15 13:11         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-30  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 11:00   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 18:31     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:57       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-30  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-30  2:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 11:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 19:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-14  9:59       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13  9:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 10:24   ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-13 10:50     ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-13 19:31       ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E707991.10705@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).