From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: RFC: s390: extension capability for new address space layout Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:31:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4E78A3B7.9070001@de.ibm.com> References: <4E787F7A.2070600@de.ibm.com> <4E788304.2050008@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: borntrae@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Marcelo Tosatti , Alexander Graf , heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, KVM list , mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.163]:56158 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775Ab1ITMbT (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:31:19 -0400 Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.129]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8KCVH4p021809 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:31:17 GMT Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.248]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p8KCVHEZ2527430 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:31:17 +0100 Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p8KCVGUf024762 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:31:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4E788304.2050008@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20.09.2011 14:11, Avi Kivity wrote: > ACK, with Alex's changes. Why are kvm changes not going in through the > kvm tree? Or at least kvm@ review? It slipped through as I've put it into our CVS to test against Martin's changes. Sorry about that, we'll make sure it won't happen again. so long, Carsten