From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby Subject: Re: Re: Questions about duplicate memory work Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:14:00 +0300 Message-ID: <4E804258.5060508@rktmb.org> References: <20110925044511.GI30419@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20110926071803.GE18099@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robin Lee Powell , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Emmanuel Noobadmin Return-path: Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]:59855 "EHLO slow3-v.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751833Ab1IZJUF (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:20:05 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E743B7E2 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:14:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/26/2011 11:15 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >>>> This means that the host *and* all tho VMs do their own disk >>>> caches/buffers and do their own swap as well. >>> If I'm not wrong, that's why the recommended and current default >>> in libvirtd is to create storage devices with no caching to remove >>> one layer of duplication. >> How do you do that? > or edit the cache attribute in the libvirt domain XML file if you're using that. Just saw it: http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsDisks <... /> Good to know. -- RMA.