From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Running KVM inside a chroot Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:56:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9BFBD2.2000103@redhat.com> References: <4E9B04FD.5030201@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Jorge Lucangeli Obes Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25357 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720Ab1JQJ4k (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:56:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/17/2011 08:10 AM, Jorge Lucangeli Obes wrote: > > What do top/vmstat/kvm_stat say? > > I'm attaching the output of the three commands during a test run > launched form inside the chroot, which was slow as usual. I didn't see > anything too weird on top/vmstat, though I found it odd that once the > VM had booted Chromium OS, QEMU still ate 100% of one core. vmstat > didn't show anything strange, QEMU taking up the memory it's supposed > to. What I don't quite know how to interpret is the output of > kvm_stat, hence the attachment. > > kvm_stat shows insane instruction emulation counts. Please post a trace as described in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function