From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:58:47 +0530 Message-ID: <4EA52FCF.2090508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023190459.16364.98151.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023221920.GA591@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Raghavendra K T , KVM , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Sedat Dilek , Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Jiang , Thomas Gleixner , Stefano Stabellini , Gleb Natapov , Yinghai Lu , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , Xen , LKML , Suzuki Poulose , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Peter Zijlstra To: Greg KH Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111023221920.GA591@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32. > > Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step? > Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll combine both the patches. > greg k-h >