From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] kvm guest : pv-ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:55:55 +0530 Message-ID: <4EA85EC3.7070102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023190753.16364.31164.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <4EA7017B.5000903@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Raghavendra K T , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "H. Peter Anvin" , Gleb Natapov , Virtualization , "x86@kernel.org" , KVM , Dave Jiang , Thomas Gleixner , Stefano Stabellini , Yinghai Lu , Sedat Dilek , Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Xen , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , LKML , Suzuki Poulose , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Peter Zijlstra To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4EA7017B.5000903@goop.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/26/2011 12:05 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 10/23/2011 12:07 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS >> + >> +#include >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS */ >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */ > > This is a big mess. Is there any problem with including linux/debugfs.h > unconditionally? Or at least using "#if > defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)&& defined(CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS)"? > I agree. I 'll include unconditionally unless somebody objects. > J