From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules. Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:49:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4EAFCED5.5000608@redhat.com> References: <1319993624-20247-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1319993624-20247-7-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, acme@ghostprotocols.net To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6272 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753362Ab1KAKuV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 06:50:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1319993624-20247-7-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/30/2011 06:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > KVM needs to know perf capability to decide which PMU it can expose to a > guest. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Peter, can you please review this, and if all is well, either apply or ack? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.