kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Keep intercepting task switching with NPT enabled
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:39:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EAFF6A5.8050308@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111101111335.GD13244@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1597 bytes --]

On 2011-11-01 12:13, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:37:32PM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 06:35 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:23:11PM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> AMD processors apparently have a bug in the hardware task switching
>>>> support when NPT is enabled. If the task switch triggers a NPF, we can
>>>> get wrong EXITINTINFO along with that fault. On resume, spurious
>>>> exceptions may then be injected into the guest.
>>>>
>>>> We were able to reproduce this bug when our guest triggered #SS and the
>>>> handler were supposed to run over a separate task with not yet touched
>>>> stack pages.
>>>>
>>>> Work around the issue by continuing to emulate task switches even in
>>>> NPT mode.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
>>>
>>
>> Will there be an erratum published for this bug?  Are all processors
>> affected?
>>
>> I'd like to limit this to just the buggy processors, if and when fixed
>> processors become available.
> 
> Actually, this isn't a bug. Please have a look at section 15.2.6 of the
> APM2:
> 
> 15.2.6 Restartable Instructions
> 
> SVM is designed to safely restart, with the exception of task switches,
> any intercepted instruction (either atomic or idempotent) after the
> intercept.
> 
> So SVM does not guarantee that an intercept during a task-switch can be
> restarted.

Not a bug but still a deficit as it makes hardware-assisted task
switching practically useless, no?

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-01 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-18 16:23 [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Keep intercepting task switching with NPT enabled Jan Kiszka
2011-10-18 16:35 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-10-18 17:37   ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-19 14:12     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-01 11:13     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-01 13:39       ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-11-01 15:30         ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-01 15:49           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-01 16:15             ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-01 18:22               ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-02  9:55                 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-02  9:59                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-02 10:04                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-27 12:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EAFF6A5.8050308@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).