kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	acme@ghostprotocols.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules.
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:49:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB014FF.5000509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319993624-20247-7-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>

On 10/30/2011 10:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> KVM needs to know perf capability to decide which PMU it can expose to a
> guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h      |   11 +++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |   11 +++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |    2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    3 +++
>  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index f61c62f..7d7e57f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -201,7 +201,18 @@ struct perf_guest_switch_msr {
>  	u64 host, guest;
>  };
>  
> +struct x86_pmu_capability {
> +	int version;
> +	int num_counters_gp;
> +	int num_counters_fixed;
> +	int bit_width_gp;
> +	int bit_width_fixed;
> +	unsigned int events_mask;
> +	int events_mask_len;
> +};
> +
>  extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
> +extern void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap);
>  #else
>  static inline perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
>  {

What about version of perf_get_x86_pmu_capability for CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
not enabled in host kernel? Next patch for KVM assumes the function is
defined.

David


> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 6408910..94ac9ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -1570,3 +1570,14 @@ unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  	return misc;
>  }
> +
> +void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap)
> +{
> +	cap->version = x86_pmu.version;
> +	cap->num_counters_gp = x86_pmu.num_counters;
> +	cap->num_counters_fixed = x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed;
> +	cap->bit_width_gp = cap->bit_width_fixed = x86_pmu.cntval_bits;
> +	cap->events_mask = x86_pmu.events_mask;
> +	cap->events_mask_len = x86_pmu.events_mask_len;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_get_x86_pmu_capability);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> index b9698d4..e9ed238 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> @@ -259,6 +259,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>  	int		num_counters_fixed;
>  	int		cntval_bits;
>  	u64		cntval_mask;
> +	u32		events_mask;
> +	int		events_mask_len;
>  	int		apic;
>  	u64		max_period;
>  	struct event_constraint *
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index e09ca20..64e5f35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  	x86_pmu.num_counters		= eax.split.num_counters;
>  	x86_pmu.cntval_bits		= eax.split.bit_width;
>  	x86_pmu.cntval_mask		= (1ULL << eax.split.bit_width) - 1;
> +	x86_pmu.events_mask		= ebx;
> +	x86_pmu.events_mask_len		= eax.split.mask_length;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Quirk: v2 perfmon does not report fixed-purpose events, so
> @@ -1651,6 +1653,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  			 * architectural event which is often completely bogus:
>  			 */
>  			intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x7f89;
> +			x86_pmu.events_mask &= ~0x40;
>  
>  			pr_cont("erratum AAJ80 worked around, ");
>  		}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-01 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-30 16:53 [PATCH 0/9] KVM in-guest performance monitoring Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: Expose kvm_lapic_local_deliver() Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: Expose a version 2 architectural PMU to a guests Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:47   ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 12:30     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 13:57       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02  9:54         ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-02  9:56           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 10:01       ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-02 11:09         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 12:03           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-03  8:31           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-15 12:04   ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix build breakage due to anonymous field initialization Jan Kiszka
2011-12-15 12:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-15 12:16       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-12-26 12:38     ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Add generic RDPMC support Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: SVM: Intercept RDPMC Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: VMX: " Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:49   ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 15:49   ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-11-01 16:13     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 16:20       ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:41         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02  7:42         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-07 14:45           ` Will Deacon
2011-11-10  8:58             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-10 12:12               ` Jason Wessel
2011-11-15 18:34                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: Expose the architectural performance monitoring CPUID leaf Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:51   ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 11:25     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 15:49   ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:18     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 16:24       ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:40         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 17:43           ` David Ahern
2011-11-02 11:18             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86 emulator: fix RDPMC privilege check Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86 emulator: implement RDPMC (0F 33) Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:57 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM in-guest performance monitoring Gleb Natapov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-03 12:31 Gleb Natapov
2011-11-03 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB014FF.5000509@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).