From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
acme@ghostprotocols.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules.
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:49:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB014FF.5000509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319993624-20247-7-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
On 10/30/2011 10:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> KVM needs to know perf capability to decide which PMU it can expose to a
> guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index f61c62f..7d7e57f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -201,7 +201,18 @@ struct perf_guest_switch_msr {
> u64 host, guest;
> };
>
> +struct x86_pmu_capability {
> + int version;
> + int num_counters_gp;
> + int num_counters_fixed;
> + int bit_width_gp;
> + int bit_width_fixed;
> + unsigned int events_mask;
> + int events_mask_len;
> +};
> +
> extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
> +extern void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap);
> #else
> static inline perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
> {
What about version of perf_get_x86_pmu_capability for CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
not enabled in host kernel? Next patch for KVM assumes the function is
defined.
David
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 6408910..94ac9ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -1570,3 +1570,14 @@ unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> return misc;
> }
> +
> +void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap)
> +{
> + cap->version = x86_pmu.version;
> + cap->num_counters_gp = x86_pmu.num_counters;
> + cap->num_counters_fixed = x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed;
> + cap->bit_width_gp = cap->bit_width_fixed = x86_pmu.cntval_bits;
> + cap->events_mask = x86_pmu.events_mask;
> + cap->events_mask_len = x86_pmu.events_mask_len;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_get_x86_pmu_capability);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> index b9698d4..e9ed238 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> @@ -259,6 +259,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
> int num_counters_fixed;
> int cntval_bits;
> u64 cntval_mask;
> + u32 events_mask;
> + int events_mask_len;
> int apic;
> u64 max_period;
> struct event_constraint *
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index e09ca20..64e5f35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> x86_pmu.num_counters = eax.split.num_counters;
> x86_pmu.cntval_bits = eax.split.bit_width;
> x86_pmu.cntval_mask = (1ULL << eax.split.bit_width) - 1;
> + x86_pmu.events_mask = ebx;
> + x86_pmu.events_mask_len = eax.split.mask_length;
>
> /*
> * Quirk: v2 perfmon does not report fixed-purpose events, so
> @@ -1651,6 +1653,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> * architectural event which is often completely bogus:
> */
> intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x7f89;
> + x86_pmu.events_mask &= ~0x40;
>
> pr_cont("erratum AAJ80 worked around, ");
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-30 16:53 [PATCH 0/9] KVM in-guest performance monitoring Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: Expose kvm_lapic_local_deliver() Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: Expose a version 2 architectural PMU to a guests Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:47 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 12:30 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 13:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-02 9:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 10:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-02 11:09 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 12:03 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-03 8:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-15 12:04 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix build breakage due to anonymous field initialization Jan Kiszka
2011-12-15 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-15 12:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-12-26 12:38 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Add generic RDPMC support Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: SVM: Intercept RDPMC Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: VMX: " Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 15:49 ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-11-01 16:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 16:20 ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-02 7:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-07 14:45 ` Will Deacon
2011-11-10 8:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-10 12:12 ` Jason Wessel
2011-11-15 18:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: Expose the architectural performance monitoring CPUID leaf Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 10:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-01 11:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 15:49 ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 16:24 ` David Ahern
2011-11-01 16:40 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-11-01 17:43 ` David Ahern
2011-11-02 11:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86 emulator: fix RDPMC privilege check Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86 emulator: implement RDPMC (0F 33) Gleb Natapov
2011-10-30 16:57 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM in-guest performance monitoring Gleb Natapov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-03 12:31 Gleb Natapov
2011-11-03 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: expose perf capability to other modules Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB014FF.5000509@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).