From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Keep intercepting task switching with NPT enabled Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:04:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4EB115B1.7040804@redhat.com> References: <4E9DA7EF.30804@siemens.com> <20111018163516.GO2198@amd.com> <4E9DB95C.1030105@redhat.com> <20111101111335.GD13244@amd.com> <4EAFF6A5.8050308@web.de> <20111101153019.GH13244@amd.com> <4EB01516.2070402@web.de> <20111101161537.GI13244@amd.com> <4EB03900.6000700@web.de> <20111102095529.GL13244@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm , Gleb Natapov To: "Roedel, Joerg" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23289 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753230Ab1KBKEh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:04:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111102095529.GL13244@amd.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/02/2011 11:55 AM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:22:56PM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2011-11-01 17:15, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > > > No, also a hypervisor that creates the nested page-page on advance falls > > > into this category. > > > > Doesn't this means all guest memory has to be backed with host memory? > > That's what I meant with "static". > > Yes, but isn't Xen working this way? I wouldn't call Xen a simple > partitioning hypervisor :) Xen is lazy, and these days they even page. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function