From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:42:22 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB3F9CE.1050407@siemens.com>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111041037290.16959@tux.localdomain> <20111104121601.GA15206@infradead.org> <CAOJsxLGf78q7rR7-q4d6TizmghFcKyK3tFOAew4i2-SHrZcvhQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111104130225.GA24563@infradead.org> <CAOJsxLG4+-Hmpt-dfa7auEs6H1RgWWwYYs=zzb8uvJg8m10_Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLG4+-Hmpt-dfa7auEs6H1RgWWwYYs=zzb8uvJg8m10_Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 2011-11-04 14:32, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> I know you don't see the benefits of integrated code base but I as a
> developer do.

IIRC, this discussion still lacks striking, concrete examples from the
KVM tool vs. QEMU development processes.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux