From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [1.0 release work] Fix regressions found on recent KVM autotest qemu master 'sanity' jobs Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:02:35 -0200 Message-ID: <4EB41AAB.6050505@redhat.com> References: <4EB41575.8070508@redhat.com> <4EB4193E.5080108@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: QEMU devel , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , KVM mailing list , Kevin Wolf , Cleber Rosa , Eduardo Habkost To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23034 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932550Ab1KDRCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:02:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4EB4193E.5080108@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri 04 Nov 2011 02:56:30 PM BRST, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/04/2011 11:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> As we understand that qemu is approaching 1.0, we think it's a good >> idea to >> share the issues we have been seeing on recent qemu.git sanity jobs: >> >> 1) Some condition is consistently making a RHEL 6.1 linux guest not >> able to >> bring up the network interface, causing login failures for all linux >> guest >> tests. This very same guest install works perfectly on qemu-kvm, RHEL >> 5 and RHEL 6. > > Can you file a bug report with specific information about how the > guest is being launched? Specifically, what NIC are we talking about? > Do other types of guests work? Ok, I will. Just FYI, it's a virtio nic. As on sanity jobs we only test RHEL 6.1 64 bit and Windows 7 SP1 64 bit, and Windows is blocked due to the other bug mentioned, I still have no idea whether other guests do work.