From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiao.grong@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:05:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBBDA3B.9040504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBBD190.2020404@gmail.com>
On 11/10/2011 03:28 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> I have tested RHEL.6.1 setup/boot/reboot/shutdown and the complete
> output of scan_results.py is attached.
>
> The result shows the performance is improved:
> before: After:
> 570 529
> 555 538
> 552 531
> 546 528
> 553 559
> 553 527
> 550 523
> 553 533
> 547 538
> 550 526
>
> How do you think about it? :)
Well, either I was sloppy in my measurements, or maybe RHEL 6 is very
different from F9 (unlikely). I'll measure it again and see.
btw, this is with ept=0, yes?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark accessed bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-22 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instructions Xiao Guangrong
2011-09-23 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: optimize for writing guest page Marcelo Tosatti
2011-09-30 3:49 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-10-05 13:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-06 17:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-10-06 17:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-10-08 4:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-10-09 12:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-09 13:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-11 8:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-04 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-06 15:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 13:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-11-10 14:05 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-11-11 3:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBBDA3B.9040504@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiao.grong@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).